Beyond “what can AI do?”
The study is focused on a more practical question: which business workflows are worth improving first, and what prevents owners from deploying them reliably?
We are speaking with owners of boutique marketing, web, design and creative agencies to understand what repetitive work consumes time, how AI is currently being used, where implementation breaks down, and what would make an AI-assisted workflow trustworthy enough to use repeatedly.
The study is focused on a more practical question: which business workflows are worth improving first, and what prevents owners from deploying them reliably?
Where appropriate, participants may receive a concise workflow analysis based on their answers, highlighting a candidate workflow, likely human-review points, and implementation considerations.
Approximately 5–8 minutes. Participants can answer asynchronously; a call is not required.
We may ask a few clarifying questions by email. A phone or video call is optional if the participant prefers it.
Some participants may later be invited to review an early paid implementation concept. Participation never requires a purchase.
We are evaluating whether a useful commercial product should be built around the problems uncovered in this research. This is not presented as university, government, or academic research.
We are especially interested in businesses that have experimented with AI tools but have not yet turned every useful idea into a documented, repeatable workflow.
James leads JTS Product Research and the current AI Workflow Adoption study. The project is focused on learning from real operators before deciding whether a commercial implementation product deserves to be built.
research@jamestradingstrategies.com
Participants may complete the research asynchronously; a phone or video call is not required.
We do not need access to your systems, customer data, or confidential files. If you are open to the study, contact us and we will send the written questions.